The Skeptic and the Man Who Has to Choose

The structure nobody mentions on the cover

This is a book about belief where neither lead believes. That is unusual and it is the reason the curse plot does not curdle.

Kate is the practical one in a family of mystics, and says so: she considers herself “the only practical, and therefore responsible, female member of the family.” Oliver is a plain-dealing English earl who calls the whole thing superstitious nonsense and means it. Neither of them is the wide-eyed one. The believers are the aunt, the grandmother, and eventually the butler.

Kate: from running the plan to being unable to finish it

Where she starts. In command and faintly embarrassed. The scheme is hers, the discipline is hers, and she has already rejected the magical shortcut her aunt offered. She is doing a dishonest thing by honest means, which she thinks is a meaningful distinction and which the book gently disagrees with.

Her aunt names the tension in the first scene: Kate is “a stickler for annoying things like honesty and a forthright manner and a direct approach,” and Hannah’s plans have rarely “included honesty.” Kate’s justification is pure pragmatism: “a forthright, honest approach will not work at all with an arrogant British lord.”

What the disguise costs her. More than she budgeted. Playing a woman with no history means she cannot use her own history, and she starts noticing herself from the outside. The key line, at page 123, comes right after she hides her fear from Oliver:

She set out to deceive a stranger and accidentally ran an audit on herself.

The turn. She stops being able to do it. The memory “returns” at page 249, on her own terms and in front of her uncle, and from there she has to be a person rather than a performance. The scheme has succeeded far enough that continuing it would cost her the thing it was for.

Where she lands. Willing to lose him. By the end she is prepared to sacrifice both the marriage and her family’s future rather than expose Oliver to a curse she does not even believe in. Her grandmother turns exactly that willingness into the argument that frees her: “As you are willing to sacrifice both your family’s future and love to save Oliver, I would think any curse worth the name would be satisfied by that.”

The skeptic’s arc ends in the only place it honestly can. Not with belief, but with accepting that she will never know and choosing anyway. Her objection, right to the last, is “But we don’t know.” The answer she gets is “There are no assurances in life, my dear child.”

Oliver: from winning to working out what he won

Where he starts. Victorious and vaguely insulted about it. He took the tontine. The other three chairs are empty. And every person in his household, led by his mother and enthusiastically joined by the staff, treats his victory as a personal failing. Page 33 catches the exact grievance: it is “irritating as well for the man who had won the tontine to be made to feel by those around him as if he had somehow failed.”

His problem is not that he cannot find a wife. It is that he has never had a reason of his own, only three friends who found theirs and a house full of people implying he is late.

The middle. He is an unusually good detective for a romance hero, and the book lets him be. He notices the Shakespeare. He notices her knowing history. He tells her plainly that he has been trying to establish who she is and admits he has not succeeded “as yet.” He is not fooled for most of the novel. He simply decides not to force it, which is its own kind of courtship.

The turn, and it is a good one. Page 304. He is leaving, and his butler describes his own dilemma back to him more accurately than he could:

He has no rebuttal. He says “You’re very good, Hollinger,” which is a man conceding.

Then the roof drops three slates at him, and he does something more interesting than believing. He constructs the rational explanation, states it confidently, agrees that a superstitious person might read it as a sign, confirms that he is not such a person, and cancels his departure anyway. He does not convert. He hedges, physically, while maintaining verbally that there is nothing to hedge against.

Where he lands. Asking her to marry him the moment the obstacle is argued away, and admitting he has wanted to since she was lying unconscious in his manor. Which is funny, because she was awake, and which is also the point: he fell for the version of her that was a performance and turns out to have been right about the person underneath it anyway.

The believers, who are not fools

Alexander could have made Aunt Hannah and the grandmother comic relief and did not. Hannah offers potions and is refused, and her actual contribution is a flawlessly executed piece of fraud: the invented Lady Fitzgivens, complete with a plausible itinerary and an unnecessary opinion about railway placement.

The grandmother is better still. She does not resolve the curse with magic. She resolves it with a logical dilemma, an appeal to what a curse “worth the name” would accept, and a refusal to overclaim: “Shall we simply say there was a curse and perhaps now there isn’t.” The most superstitious person in the novel is also the most rigorous.

Side by side

Read directly from the novel, Kindle edition, and described in our own words. · Book hub · Characters · Last Man Standing