The Best Premise in the Series, and the Shakiest Third Act
Two liars with equal standing is a far better engine than one rake and one wronged woman. Then it hands the ending to an envelope.
The short version
This is the strongest setup Alexander has built across these three books, and the one I would hand to somebody who says they do not read historical romance. It is also the one where I can point at the exact page the machinery becomes visible.
What it gets right
Both of them are lying, and the book refuses to rank the lies
The easy version of a mistaken-identity romance has a deceiving hero and an innocent heroine, and resolves when he grovels convincingly. Alexander gives them the same crime. Cordelia lies first. Daniel lies better. Neither has the standing to be outraged, and the third act consequently cannot be solved by anyone being sorrier than the other one.
That single structural choice does more for this book than any amount of chemistry would have.
The heroine’s objection is a good objection
Cordelia never refuses the arranged marriage. Her position is that she has not been given enough information to consent to it properly, and the entire plot is her going out and collecting the missing data by improper means. That is a smarter engine than romantic defiance and it fits the period instead of fighting it.
She is written as methodical rather than spirited, which is rarer and harder. She critiques her own first attempt as “not well executed” and comes back prepared. I would trust this woman with a spreadsheet.
Page 245
The moment she works out that he knows, and decides to say nothing, is the best beat in the series so far. Most books would spend that reveal on a confrontation. Alexander spends it on a woman choosing to keep her advantage, and the power in the relationship shifts without a single raised voice. See the reacts, where I get properly excited about it.
The father plot is better than the romance plot
Daniel discovering, at page 162, that the father he spent a decade proving himself to was proud of him the entire time is the most emotionally precise thing in the novel. “Am I?” Daniel said weakly. Two words. A man’s whole organizing principle quietly failing.
The comedy is actually funny
Four nephews blackmailing their aunt into taking them on a night expedition. A butler destroying a three-hundred-page deception by competently describing someone’s eye color. A man being ignored twice in a row while trying to explain that he does not know a woman he has been impersonating a friend of. Alexander writes ensemble comedy properly, which is to say the jokes come from the characters wanting incompatible things at the same time.
What it flinches from
The inheritance clause arrives late and carries too much
The entire third act turns on Cordelia learning Daniel needed the marriage in connection with an inheritance. It is the device that converts a warm book into a furious one, and it shows up near the end without having been seeded properly earlier. A reveal that reframes a whole relationship should have been visible in hindsight. This one mostly just arrives.
The unopened letter
He writes an explanation. It is delivered. She does not read it, and says so at the altar. I have a full rant about this, but for review purposes: a conflict that one opened envelope would resolve is a conflict standing on one leg. Her reason for not reading it is defensible. The book still leans on it harder than it can bear.
Daniel’s test is never fully reckoned with
He runs an experiment on a woman to find out whether she would want him without his money. She never agreed to sit it. The novel is clear-eyed enough to know this is unfair, but it is more interested in his insecurity than in her having been used as an instrument. I wanted one scene where somebody says that out loud to him. As far as I read, nobody does.
Who should read it
| You will like it if | You will not if |
|---|---|
| You want a heroine who investigates rather than rebels | Big misunderstandings make you want to throw things |
| You like ensemble comedy with children in it | You need the couple alone on the page |
| You enjoy watching two clever people out-clever themselves | You want a hero who is straightforwardly good |
| Father and son estrangement gets you | You came strictly for the romance plot |
Where it sits in the series
Better premise than A Little Bit Wicked. Messier ending than What a Lady Wants, which knew exactly what it was doing in its last fifty pages. If you are reading the tontine books in order this is the one where the series structure finally announces itself, in an epilogue that is worth the whole book on its own.
Read it third, as intended. The epilogue will make you start the next one immediately, which I assume was the plan.
Read directly from the novel, Kindle edition, and described in our own words. No review copy, no publisher relationship. · Book hub · All RaeRae Reviews